A review of the literature related to tutor training revealed repeated requests for more research on the need for and effects of training adult peer tutors.
The literature review also provided insights into the reasons for the dearth of comprehensive investigations on adult tutors in post-secondary institutions.
Many of the studies used informal comments or evaluations by tutors to assess the effects of the training provided.
The design and limitations of the studies reviewed provided the impetus for the research design and for the researcher-created instruments used in this study.
Then, conclusions will be discussed based on researcher insights gained regarding study findings and limitations.
In addition, two sets of recommendations are presented.
The first two research questions were expanded to investigate effects on total scores and on sub-test scores by topic.
The third research question was expanded to include identified variables for investigation.
Research question one was expanded to include the following hypotheses: H0.1: There are no significant differences in the total mean score on the TSORA among three groups of tutors, those with 1) no training, 2) 0-9.9 hours of training, and 3) 10 or more hours of training, based on the amount of training offered during the study.
H0.2: There are no significant differences in any one of the six sub-test mean scores on the TSORA among three groups of tutors, those with 1) no training, 2) 0-.9 hours of training, and 3) 1 or more hours of training, based on the amount of training offered during the study in each of the following six sub-test topics: a) Definition of tutoring and tutoring responsibilities b) Active listening and paraphrasing c) Setting goals/planning d) Modeling problem-solving e) Referral skills f) Study skills Research question two was expanded to include the following two hypotheses (H0.3 and H0.4).