Scientific papers typically have two audiences: first, the referees, who help the journal editor decide whether a paper is suitable for publication; and second, the journal readers themselves, who may be more or less knowledgeable about the topic addressed in the paper.
To be accepted by referees and cited by readers, papers must do more than simply present a chronological account of the research work.
In other words, the task clarifies your contribution as a scientist, whereas the object of the document prepares readers for the structure of the paper, thus allowing focused or selective reading. " Although papers can be organized into sections in many ways, those reporting experimental work typically include Materials and Methods, Results, and Discussion in their body.
For the task, the effects of a range of inhibitors of connexin channels, such as the connexin mimetic peptides Gap26 and Gap27 and anti-peptide antibodies, on calcium signaling in cardiac cells and He La cells expressing connexins. In any case, the paragraphs in these sections should begin with a topic sentence to prepare readers for their contents, allow selective reading, and — ideally — get a message across.
Scientific papers are for sharing your own original research work with other scientists or for reviewing the research conducted by others.
Consider anchoring the context in time, using phrases such as recently, in the past 10 years, or since the early 1990s.
You may also want to anchor your context in space (either geographically or within a given research field).
First and foremost, they summarize the motivation for, and the outcome of, the work in an abstract, located before the Introduction.
In a sense, they reveal the beginning and end of the story — briefly — before providing the full story.