He commended King for his handling of a "difficult" topic "with broad learning, impressive ability and convincing mastery of the works immediately involved." Schilling found two problems with King's citation practices while reading the draft, but dismissed these as anomalous and praised the dissertation in his Second Reader's report....As was true of King's other academic papers, the plagiaries in his dissertation escaped detection in his lifetime.Tags: How To Write An A Essay5 Step Problem Solving ProcessGood Persuasive Essay About School UniformsPublish DissertationPersonal Narrative Essay FriendshipCreative Writing Prompts For 3rd GradeFirst Writing PaperLeadership Problem Solving
This is a digitized version of an article from The Times’s print archive, before the start of online publication in 1996.
To preserve these articles as they originally appeared, The Times does not alter, edit or update them. reluctantly acknowledged yesterday that substantial parts of Dr.
In one case, although King had properly quoted Tillich on the notecard, he used a section of the quotation in his dissertation without quotation marks.
Some of the notecards were adequately paraphrased from Tillich and Weiman, but many others were nearly identical to the source.
He spoke at a news conference at Stanford, called after an article in The Wall Street Journal yesterday disclosed details of the project's findings. King had been sufficiently well acquainted with academic principles and procedures to have understood the need for extensive footnotes, and he was at a loss to explain why Dr. But it is not likely, even if plagiarism is proved, that the Ph. degree in theology would be revoked, because neither Dr.
"By the strictest definition of plagiarism -- that is, any appropriation of words or ideas -- there are instances of plagiarism in these papers." A Lack of Answers Although he said that he believed Dr. King nor his dissertation adviser is alive to defend the work.Luker, who worked on the King Papers Project directing the research on King's early life, King's paper The Chief Characteristics and Doctrines of Mahayana Buddhism Moreover, the farther King went in his academic career, the more deeply ingrained the patterns of borrowing language without clear attribution became.Thus, the plagiarism in his dissertation seemed to be, by then, the product of his long-established practice. in the November 9, 1990, edition of the Wall Street Journal, under the title of "To Their Dismay, King Scholars Find a Troubling Pattern".The controversy comes after a series of allegations over the past year and a half about Mr.King's extramarital sexual habits and conflicts within his family.King's faulty citation practices were rooted in the notecards he created while conducted research on Tillich and Wieman.Large sections of the expository chapters are verbatim transcriptions of these notecards in which errors he had made while creating his notes are perpetuated.King rarely noted down proper citations as he took notes.In September 1962, SNCC activist Prathia Hall had spoken at a service commemorating Mount Olive Baptist Church in Terrell County, Georgia, which had been burned to the ground by the Ku Klux Klan.As Clayborne Carson, director of the King Papers Project at Stanford University, has written, "instances of textual appropriation can be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his dissertation.The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and sermons throughout his career." According to civil rights historian Ralph E.