For example, a recurrent and comprehensive set of cannabis-related questions could be added to existing national health surveys.Researchers could use the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System to track changes in the prevalence of medical and recreational cannabis use; the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to assess the impact of medical cannabis laws on health care treatments and costs; and the National Vital Statistics System to monitor changes in the incidence rate of cannabis-related overdose deaths.Multiple stakeholders can contribute to these efforts.
For example, a recurrent and comprehensive set of cannabis-related questions could be added to existing national health surveys.Tags: Role Of Cps EssayEssays Friendship StudentsDiscursive And Argumentative EssaysGood Thesis Statement Embryonic Stem Cell ResearchIntroduction For Global Warming ThesisEssay About Saving Our EarthScience Fiction Term PapersCritical Thinking ReadingEresearch PaperMa Thesis On Vocabulary
In their potential role as conveners, the National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) and the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) can aid federal agencies and state and local health departments in assessing the capacity to expand the resources of public health surveillance systems, as well as in articulating strategies and prioritizing the actions necessary to meet the needs of a comprehensive cannabis research agenda.
Recommendation 3: To ensure that sufficient data are available to inform research on the short- and long-term health effects of cannabis use (both harmful and beneficial effects), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the National Association of County and City Health Officials, the Association of Public Health Laboratories, and state and local public health departments should fund and support improvements to federal public health surveillance systems and state-based public health surveillance efforts.
The research agenda should include basic science studies to help inform efforts to minimize harms and maximize benefits associated with the acute and chronic use of cannabis and cannabinoids, as well as health policy and public health research to examine the health effects of broader social and behavioral changes associated with the legalization of recreational and/or medical cannabis and other changes in cannabis policy.
To support the statistical associations identified in epidemiological research, the research agenda should also include basic science research that identifies plausible mechanisms by which cannabis affects specific health endpoints.
This is a pivotal time in the world of cannabis policy and research.
Shifting public sentiment, conflicting and impeded scientific research, and legislative battles have fueled the debate about what, if any, harms or benefits can be attributed to the use of cannabis or its derivatives.
State public health departments can collaborate with Association of Public Health Laboratories to use existing public health laboratories to provide diagnostic tools and other laboratory resources to meet the needs of clinical and public health professionals engaged in cannabis research.
Because of differences in cannabis product type, availability, access, and regulation, such surveillance efforts need to be state based, for the time being.
The aspirational goal and organizing principle of this agenda should be to maximize the population-health impact of cannabis research.
Achieving this objective will require coordination and collaboration among researchers and research groups; support from stakeholders at the local, state, and national levels; and the concurrent pursuit of several distinct research streams, including clinical and observational research and research in the areas of health policy, health economics, public health, and public safety.