Tags: Ielts Essay Computer SOrwell Writing EssayHappy Birthday Essay For GirlfriendEssay On Mass Media CommunicationTransitioning Words For EssaysCt Scan EssayJyj Music Essay ComposerEthics And Values In Social Work EssaysEssay On The Weary Blues
To critique their behavior now isn’t “turning on our own,” it’s merely critiquing power and waking us up to other possibilities.“California now bans taxpayer-funded travel to any state that “authorizes discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression,” a list that includes Alabama, Kansas, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Texas. Near the end of his piece, Kirchick writes: “The smallness of the American debate over these issues does not really strike you until you’ve spent time overseas in places where it is truly dangerous to be gay.Across wide swaths of the planet, homosexuality itself — or even the advocacy of equal rights — is criminalized, and societal acceptance lags far behind that found in the liberal democratic West.As the Libertarian psychiatrist, Thomas Szasz, has said: “The Church opposed homosexuality not only, or even primarily, because it was ‘abnormal’ or ‘unnatural,’ but rather because it satisfied carnal lust and yielded bodily pleasure.”But the opposition of the Church to conduct which had been an accepted part of the way of life of many peoples in the Mediterranean area and elsewhere, would probably have meant little, except for one circumstance.
This largely ignores the other social factors working against us and would be somewhat like declaring that blacks achieved racial equality somewhere around the ’60s even though the rampant abuses of racism continue today.
Here are five other quotes from Kirchick’s article that shows that he really doesn’t get it.
Just because Trump didn’t target gay people during his campaign doesn’t mean he isn’t now.
Trump’s administration has supported religious business owners refusing service to gay people, federally funded adoption agencies denying kids to same-sex couples and tearing apart bi-national same-sex families.
America is a land of some 330 million people, and I do not require every small-business owner across the country to reject 2,000 years of religious teaching in order to pursue my happiness.” Namely, Jack Phillips, the owner of the Masterpiece Cakeshop, refused to sell an engaged gay couple a wedding cake before any discussion on the artistry of the cake could be discussed.
That is, the gay couple merely asked him for a wedding cake — something once sold to straight couples — and he refused. And even though he says “many, if not most, of the gay people I know can live with the fact that a baker in Colorado does not approve of our relationships,” this isn’t about based on their religious beliefs.It’s difficult to prove when maltreatment is caused by queer identity because many anti-LGBTQ bigots caught discriminating will quickly say they have no issues with queer people whatsoever and even hate crimes charges are harder to prove unless the person says something explicitly anti-gay while committing their crimes.Queer people are also sometimes afraid to report discrimination incidents to police, human resources or civil rights groups for fear of enduring a long, drawn-out costly battle that might subject them to further mistreatment or might not be taken seriously to begin with.“The [U. Supreme Court] assailed Colorado bureaucrats for running roughshod over the First Amendment rights of the [Masterpiece Cakeshop] baker, whose religious convictions forbade him not from serving gay people — he offered to make the couple all the baked goods they could ever wish to consume — but from expressing approval for something he considers sinful.Now the ecclesiastical authorities struck a bargain with the political power—destined to last for more than a thousand years—whereby each would render the other all possible assistance in planting their feet on the necks of the people.The Church would mystify and exalt the Sate, and, in return, the State, and, in return, the State would put its coercive force at the disposal of the Church.One major form of sexual sensibility and activity that has especially suffered from this restrictive attitude has been homosexuality.Judeo-Christian civilization is characterized, when compared to other great civilizations—for instance, those of classical antiquity, of some of the Oriental peoples, or of Islam—by a special repugnance and hatred towards homosexual acts.Official Western norms, in fact, have tended to polarize individuals into a majority of individuals self-identified as strictly “heterosexual” (with frequent “lapses” from both categories).This polarization as well as the extraordinary antagonism to gay love, are in large part traceable to the general antisexual bias of early Christianity.But he seems to think that these are suddenly “extraneous” issues, as if black people were neither gay nor subject to the widespread institutional brutality by police, the judicial system and detainment facilities that continues to disproportionately affect LGBTQ people — all things that Black Lives Matter opposes.As for “turning on their own,” gay cis white men have long sat in the driver’s seat of the gay rights movement. But it does boost those political forces bent on convincing Americans that the gay-rights movement will only be satisfied once every individual citizen agrees with its precepts (a tough proposition in a religious country), and that gays will use strong-arm tactics to achieve this goal.” One wonders whether Kirchick would write the same thing about state governments not wanting to fund travel to segregationist states during the pre-civil rights movement, or to modern-day states that outlawing abortion.